Shell the Creative Process…


While my workshops attendees are making their photographs, very often, I come to them and interrupt them asking this question :  » What do you consider to be the three essential ingredients on your Photography ? ».  For those who are beginners, sure, there no precise answer, for the others, most of the time,  it’s about a subject matter, a good lighting and for the most advanced : a good composition. I admit the question is not an easy one. As far as I’m concerned, my answer is « Simplicity, Emotion and Beauty » because I think a good lighting is a method more than an ending in itself, the same for a « good composition ». balancing an image will maybe result in a simple message but what’s the goal ? Create an Emotion !  There is this quotation from David Ward  I really like :  » It should be stressed that when I make an image, I don’t consult a mental list : have I included ambiguity ? Is this beautiful, is it simple enough ? Passion and instinct take over and it is only afterwards that I ask why an image worked…« 

Read More

Vision & Style…


We all have a very personal way to perceive what surround us and, as Photographers, we all have a specific message to transmit using a very personal set of « words », a unique palette of terms that build our style. Photography is the way I have chosen to express my view. Amateur or professional, how do we « speak » in a way that is unique to us ? It’s a challenge to define what makes one Photographer’s work stand out from another’s. It’s quite difficult to describe what makes our images unique.. what it is that makes our photographs better than our earlier images keeping our values, our style, our unique DNA in our work ? As a Photographer, my goal is to continue to grow creatively and to express myself even better.

It’s the main issue : Does our Vision implies our Style, I mean, is our Style a simple expression of our Vision OR, does our Style, impact the way we perceive our surroundings : our Vision ? I think my Vision is what I show in my pictures. I admit I have to favor my perception via post-production but I always preview the image when releasing the shutter. I never work my images at random, the edit phase is always in conformity with a pre-thought design. I fight against these software packages for altering images through pre-defined recipes if they are used without a plan, without a Vision ! Creativity is not bundled in boxes you can buy in a store.

We have to be careful not to be prisoner of our own style. I think that striving for a particular style could limit creativity by inhibiting an open mind, by rejecting new approaches. Style is an outcome not a goal in itself.

Music as a Component…

Lenine_CD LR

I would not like to pretend there is a fail-safe recipe to stimulate creativity. This would be pretentious and inexact. Nevertheless, I can assert Music can help. It helps to disconnect from day-to-day concerns and elevate your mind to abstract concepts. The goal is to undress elements from their rational and functional role to see them as design parts. By surrounding our senses with a compelling atmosphere, Music will exacerbate our vision by putting in phase subject matter and emotions. With the amazing qualities we have today in our headphones, it’s quite easy to escape from crude reality and be transported to some kind of unreal, immaterial realm where Creativity seems to grow naturally.

The challenge I ‘m confronted with is to retrieve this mood when derushing the RAW images.. All the difficulty is to find and raise up the seeds you have buried when pressing the shutter release. This is the wager of post-production…

The Photographer’s Voice


Photographs are necessarily always of the world but if we want to move beyond illustration, they must evoke emotional responses that are not bound to a particular place. A famous place is weighed down with unavoidable and often unwanted connotations. In an anonymous place the photographer is more likely to be free of the unwanted connotations that arise from images of iconic locations. There is no wager, no competition to win except conveying a strong message. When we, Photographers , go to dreamed remote locations, we have in mind all that have been done before by famous Masters, we can never completely escape from their footprints. Then making images become a challenge… but the apparent immutability of these hotspots gives some photographers the false hope that they might repeat, or even better, a famous image made at a particular location. However, a landscape photograph draws its power in part from the unstable and dynamic relationship between the fall of light and the solid geography. This relationship makes it very difficult to create the same image on two separate occasions.

We should keep in mind a great photograph is an image who expounds an emotion which is, by definition, a personal mood : It is what we call the Photographer’s Voice.Photographers should strive for their own voice, strive to say something genuinely different and strictly intimate rather than repeating the composition of another, repeating, doing so, what has already been « said ».

Workshop : Learning To See…

Difficulty: Beginners – Intermediates – Advanced

Cost per Attendee : 400 €  ( Lodging and Catering included ).

Contact Me for more info using this form ( at the end of the page… )

Less is More…


Click on the image to enlarge it…

« Less is More… » this famous and pithy line by Robert Browning, seems to apply to so many aspects of Art. For me, it expresses how rich nuances of form can arise from a single  line across an extent of sand or how a simple melody can evoke deep emotions. It also conveys how the very best artists in any field can make complex things that they do appear incredibly simple. Simplicity, clarity and economy of line are things that I strive for in my own work. Experience has taught me that my most graphic images – those with the least in them – are often my most powerful – : They say the most !

We all are aware of how difficult it is to achieve simplicity  in a Photograph but it is obvious to me that there is much more to admire in simplicity than just how tricky it is to accomplish.

Read More

Depth Of Field…


Click on the image to enlarge it…

Simply put, Depth-Of-Field is how much of a photograph is in sharp focus from front to back. Professional photographers understand and use Depth Of Field, while most amateurs don’t. professionals know that they can’t leave this critical element to chance, or to the programmed whims of an automatic camera !

Landscapes Masters, Porter, Weston and Adams always tried to get everything in focus throughout  their photographs, to the point of forming Group f/64 in 1932. Part of their original manifesto read : « The name of this Group is derived from a diaphragm number of the photographic lens. It signifies to a large extent the qualities of clearness and definition of the photographic image  which is an important element in the work of members  of this Group. »

Modern Photography aesthetics accept a wide range of styles, including more impressionistic looks. But in most landscapes images, everything should be in focus unless there’s a specific reason for not doing so – like creating a soft, impressionistic look, or focusing attention on one element.



For many photographers, no aspect of photography is more difficult than composition. Perhaps, for that reason,  people have tried to create rules for composing photographs. But the landscape Masters of the past were unanimous in their disdain for such formulas.

« To consult the rules of Composition before making a Photograph is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk » said Weston. While rules ( maybe guidelines would be a better word… ) can be helpful in some situations, design is too complex for any rule to apply in all situations. The only one I know that always apply is Simplicity.